The 1860 Census and Slavery in the United States

Interpreting Census Data and Research on Pre-Civil War Slavery

9 Comments
Join the Conversation
Plantation Workers in the South - Public Domain. No copyright
Plantation Workers in the South - Public Domain. No copyright
The 1860 census dispels myths about Southern slavery but also allows the researcher to develop new conclusions regarding the role of slavery and the coming of war.

On the Eve of the US Civil War, the 1860 national census revealed the prevalence of slavery in the South and helped answer future questions as to why thousands of non-slave holding whites, mostly yeomen farmers, enlisted in the “Cause.” Additional research highlights the treatment of free blacks in the South and the incidents of blacks owning slaves.

United States Slavery and the 1860 Census

Of the 27 million whites counted in the 1860 census, 8 million lived in the slave owning states of the South. Of these, 385,000 owned slaves. Statistically, 4.8% of all Southern whites owned slaves. When factored by the entire population, 1.4% of all United States whites were slave owners. The Gone With the Wind notion that most Southerners owned large numbers of slaves and lived in huge plantations is a myth.

Deep South states held the most slaves and this is where most of the larger plantations existed. Mississippi’s slave population stood at 55% out of a total population of 791,305. South Carolina’s slave population represented 57% of the total population. These percentages decrease with upper South states like Virginia (31%), Tennessee (25%), and Kentucky (20%). Border States like Maryland accounted for the lowest numbers (13%).

In 1860, there were 4.5 million blacks in the United States, 4 million living in the South. Of those, 261,988 were free blacks living in the South, usually in urban centers like New Orleans that accounted for 10,689 free blacks. Restrictions on free blacks were severe, however. They could not move from one state to another and in 1859 the Arkansas legislature, for example, passed a law ordering sheriffs to force freedmen out of the state. The Arkansas slave population was at 26%.

Free Blacks That Owned Slaves in the Pre-Civil War South

According to Duke University’s Emeritus Professor, John Hope Franklin, in New Orleans over 3000 free blacks owned slaves themselves (or 28% of the black population). In Louisiana, 6 blacks owned 65 or more slaves while in Charleston, SC, 125 blacks owned slaves, 6 owning ten or more. In North Carolina there were 69 black slave owners.

Statistically, this represents a fraction of all slave holders and many theories can be ventured to explain the phenomenon. In some cases, free blacks with financial means used the system to buy the freedom of family and friends, perhaps through the slave system, thus adding to statistical data that usually paints a sterile picture and leaves interpretations to the historian. It would be grossly negligent to use such statistics to justify slavery by intimating that free blacks supported the evil institution.

Why Did Non-Slave Owning Whites Support the System?

Slavery was enshrined in the Constitution of the Confederate States of America. Most of the political and military leaders of the Rebel States, as Lincoln called them, owned slaves. As recent historians like James McPherson of Princeton have demonstrated, non-slave owning whites enlisted to fight for an ideal of freedom (generally, freedom from “Northern tyranny”). But this also entailed the full acceptance of the peculiar institution that drove the Southern economy.

It wasn’t about slavery per se, but more about a lifestyle and culture that existed, at its core, because of slavery. Slavery dominated every aspect of Southern existence, regardless of how many people actually owned slaves. That the South saw itself as a confederation of sovereign state entities able to leave the federal union was based on John C. Calhoun’s notion that the South could not safely remain in the Union if the North challenged slavery. Slavery was the dagger that pierced the heart of the Union in 1861.

Sources & Further Reading:

Alfred H. Kelly and Winfred A. Harbison, The American Constitution: Its Origins & Development (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1976)

Frederick Merk, History of the Westward Movement (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978)

Howard Zinn, A People’s History of the United States (available on-line)

The 1860 Census

Holland, Tport

Michael Streich - Former Adjunct Instructor, History & Global Studies

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 2+7?

Comments

Mar 30, 2010 9:20 PM
Guest :
Howard Zinn is a radical leftist.
Apr 9, 2010 11:52 PM
Guest :
Mr. Streich states "On the Eve of the US Civil War, the 1860 national census revealed the prevalence of slavery in the South and helped answer future questions as to why thousands of non-slave holding whites, mostly yeomen farmers, enlisted in the “Cause.”

The major dividing line between North and South was the issue of States Rights. Southern states felt that the increase in tariffs on imports served well the Northern, industrial states, but did the opposite for southern agricultural states. Slavery only became a major issue so as to gain the nomination for Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln, while not a slave owner, wrote letters to associates and made speeches in which he stated he did not feel blacks and whites were equal, should not intermarry, serve on juries or vote. Just before his assassination he discussed with a colleague the possibility of sending the freed slaves to Panama to dig the now famous canal.

If one writes about historical events, one should not resort to giving only the "popularly" held belief, but should strive to give factual information. Slavery was not the cause of the Civil War. Federal vs States Rights and unfair tariffs brought about the Civil War.

Apr 26, 2010 10:22 AM
Guest :
It was short, to the point and enlightening.
Apr 29, 2010 5:40 PM
Guest :
Then what was the Fugitive Slave Act? It restricted slavery and infringed on northern states rights. The civil war was all about slavery, but it was the cause behind the cause in all of the arguments of the time. tariffs, free-labor, states rights, western expansion, and sectionalism were all veiled iterations of the fundamental division of Slavery. This is the prevailing view among historians. The article is informative and has some good analysis.
Jun 28, 2010 5:45 AM
Guest :
I grew up in lower South Carolina. Very much a southerner, but never agreed with my fellow southerns that slavery served any purpose. Can remeber being chastised for being outspoken about how foolish it was for poor whites to support the slave owners. I wish the history books would have addressed this issue more so. Back in the 1950's we had southerners still living in the ante-bellum days and still fighting the Civil war. I was often depicted as an odd ball by those who knew me well. rvoncuwick@insightbb.com
Oct 22, 2010 5:37 AM
Guest :
So what you are saying is that poor, uneducated whites decided to fight in this bloody civil war for a system that kept them poor, and at the lowest end of the white food chain, because they wanted to maintain STATES RIGHTS! They were not convinced by the wealthy few that it was in their best interest because they were better than slaves, eventhough they, poor whites were treated like the mudsill of the white society; but at least they weren't black
Dec 10, 2010 12:37 AM
Guest :
A good read, the language seems balanced...
Mar 29, 2011 4:03 PM
Guest :
Howard Zinn was a brillent historian.
Apr 12, 2011 12:35 PM
Guest :
okay
9 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement